<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.3-beta1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some thoughts on The Universe in a Single Atom</title>
	<link>http://spiritblooms.gaiastream.com/2007/04/03/some-thoughts-on-the-universe-in-a-single-atom/</link>
	<description>"I am certain of nothing but the holiness of the heart’s affections and the truth of imagination." ~~John Keats</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.3-beta1</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Some thoughts on The Universe in a Single Atom by: Todd Green</title>
		<link>http://spiritblooms.gaiastream.com/2007/04/03/some-thoughts-on-the-universe-in-a-single-atom/#comment-1298</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 02:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spiritblooms.gaiastream.com/2007/04/03/some-thoughts-on-the-universe-in-a-single-atom/#comment-1298</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I refer to the unknown, and our ability or inability to find peace with the fact that so much is still unknown.&lt;/i&gt;

Believing that we do know keeps the mind from enjoying the peace and joy found in wondering and fosters the fear that we may be wrong. The title of the book, &lt;i&gt;The Universe in a Single Atom&lt;/i&gt;, is a metaphor for as close to expressing the truth without claiming to know anything while leaving it all to be contemplated in fact transcendent joy. Thinking one may not know is much more liberating and educational that believing in arguable facts, but then what would academia have to do then. Fear of not knowing is the motivation for drawing conclusions which, logic tells us, deny far more than they accept by being the ends of thinking or admitting to new contradictory experience. Maybe.

Robert Anton Wilson's &lt;i&gt;Maybe Logic&lt;/i&gt; is a wonderful parallel to the Dali Lama's book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>&#8220;I refer to the unknown, and our ability or inability to find peace with the fact that so much is still unknown.</i></p>
	<p>Believing that we do know keeps the mind from enjoying the peace and joy found in wondering and fosters the fear that we may be wrong. The title of the book, <i>The Universe in a Single Atom</i>, is a metaphor for as close to expressing the truth without claiming to know anything while leaving it all to be contemplated in fact transcendent joy. Thinking one may not know is much more liberating and educational that believing in arguable facts, but then what would academia have to do then. Fear of not knowing is the motivation for drawing conclusions which, logic tells us, deny far more than they accept by being the ends of thinking or admitting to new contradictory experience. Maybe.</p>
	<p>Robert Anton Wilson&#8217;s <i>Maybe Logic</i> is a wonderful parallel to the Dali Lama&#8217;s book.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Some thoughts on The Universe in a Single Atom by: Marion</title>
		<link>http://spiritblooms.gaiastream.com/2007/04/03/some-thoughts-on-the-universe-in-a-single-atom/#comment-1019</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://spiritblooms.gaiastream.com/2007/04/03/some-thoughts-on-the-universe-in-a-single-atom/#comment-1019</guid>
					<description>Oh, wow, what a great post! I admire your reading The Universe in a Single Atom...it would not be an easy read for myself.  I have great difficulty, as you say, wrapping my mind around this kind of thing.

I get my partner to read these books, and explain the premise to me in terms I can understand, lol!

And you've done the same...thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, wow, what a great post! I admire your reading The Universe in a Single Atom&#8230;it would not be an easy read for myself.  I have great difficulty, as you say, wrapping my mind around this kind of thing.</p>
	<p>I get my partner to read these books, and explain the premise to me in terms I can understand, lol!</p>
	<p>And you&#8217;ve done the same&#8230;thank you!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
